After reviewing Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources, explain approaches to community intervention and evaluation. Implement a teaching and evaluation plan.
Choose one topic from the prevention strategies and intervention recommendations identified in Module 4 Assignment.
Develop a teaching plan, including objective, content outline, teaching method, and time in a table format found in slide 3 of the Template Download Template.
Develop an evaluation plan for your teaching intervention and create a tool for feedback from your learners. Be sure to include the questionnaire and any other teaching tools within the powerpoint presentation for faculty analysis.
Implement the teaching plan and evaluation during Visit 5 of your clinical experience.
Summarize the outcomes of your teaching plan and evaluation based on the results from the questionnaires.
(POWERPOINT)Submission Instructions:
The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
The paper is to be 5 slides in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
Your paper should be formatted per APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
Presentation RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsIdentification of Main Issues/Problems
4 pts
Distinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
3 pts
Excellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
2 pts
Fair
Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
1 pts
Poor
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
/ 4 pts
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms
4 pts
Distinguished
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
3 pts
Excellent
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
2 pts
Fair
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
1 pts
Poor
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
/ 4 pts
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding
4 pts
Distinguished
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
3 pts
Excellent
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
2 pts
Fair
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
1 pts
Poor
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
/ 4 pts
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature
4 pts
Distinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
3 pts
Excellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
2 pts
Fair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
1 pts
Poor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
/ 4 pts
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines