use the attached solution and make ppt

Requirements: 4+ ppt. Assignment

Student’s Name

Name of Instructor

Course

Part 1

Traditionally, the CIA’s obsession with secrecy was seen as a necessary evil because it was a high-stakes environment where nations began to spy on each other as intelligence operations became counter-intelligence operations (Whipple, 2021). Nevertheless, advancement in the security domain brings a risk of narrow-mindedness, which may decrease the willingness to share crucial details, limit the ability to be creative and outside the box or confine the scope of the agency to stay in the shadow of the savvy enemy.

Practicing realistic transparency measures wherever possible would help the establishment of transparency with the public, which could then contribute to strengthening public trust and the facilitation of necessary oversight without sacrificing the core service secrecy (Saldanha et al., 2022). In addition, fostering a work culture that eliminates bureaucracy barriers and forges divine consensus among agencies could discover an unsuspected pairing of agencies. Last, leadership must recognize and reward persons daring to try rational risks and possibilities. This way, the agency remains enviably cutting-edge and inventive.

Besides these figures of merit, other aspects of CIA culture need to be custody in the name of the future (Dollbaum et al., 2021). One aspect yet to be addressed is the organization’s way of obtaining diversity and inclusion. Although the CIA has a diversity policy, how it attracts, trains, and retains professionals from diverse backgrounds needs to be revised and renewed because how it promotes, discusses, and utilizes the talents of all employees is still an unresolved issue.

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has followed a covert culture for quite a long time, rooted in its early-stage training during the Cold War era. Although the agency must jealously guard secret operations and classified information at all costs, the very vulnerability that comes with excessive secrecy has invited critics to accuse the agency of promoting risk aversion, stifling innovation, and hindering adaptability. This thesis calls for introducing the CIA-targeted cultural reforms to make the Agency more transparent, facilitate cooperation with other government departments, and encourage accountability and willingness to take calculated risk-taking as measures of improvement against new threats.

Part 2

In my opinion, the most prominent intelligence classification among all the other disciplines must be human intelligence (HUMINT). HUMINT might confirm the information from human sources like undercover agents, informants, and defectors by interviewing potential suspects and interrogating accused individuals.

Introducing them definitely will be resisted by someone who still believes in the prerogatives of the existing system. A multi-faceted initiative that combines training renovation, a new awarding system, and the elite being the example might bring the CIA’s culture into a new change phase. The key is that the necessary shifts should ensure an adequate balance – between the CIA’s inviolable need to safeguard its assets and the transparency required to keep the public informed and allow us to function safely and effectively.

The role of human intelligence (HUMINT) has been unshakable, especially in the intelligence domain (Liao, 2023). Technical sets are very influential, but the sharp brains of human sources cannot be compared with intelligence in the drivers of adversary processes and their decision-making, which makes political administration more informed. But of course, the need for strong HUMINT must be kept on the agenda and given priority.

Reference

Dollbaum, J. M., Lallouet, M., & Noble, B. (2021). Navalny: Putin’s Nemesis, Russia’s Future?. Oxford University Press.

Whipple, C. (2021). The Spymasters: How the CIA Directors Shape History and the Future. Simon and Schuster.

Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022). Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101680.

Liao, A. (2023). Autonomy, Influence, and Impunity: the Failures of the Western Intelligence Institution.