Sign Up to our Q&A Engine to ask questions, answer student’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our Q&A Engine to ask questions, answer other student’s questions & connect with academic writers and other students .
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
“Should the 2nd Amendment protecting the right to bear arms be repealed today during the twenty-first century? Are you for or against the government revoking or infringing upon this fundamental constitutional right? State yes, or no, and explain why.”
500 words
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (United States Constitution, 1791).
The debate over the interpretation of the Second Amendment and whether or not it should be repealed in the 21st century is a complex and controversial topic. Some argue that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual’s right to own firearms and that any infringement on this right is a violation of the Constitution. Others argue that the Second Amendment was written in a different time and context, and that it should be interpreted in a way that takes into account modern technology and societal changes (Levinson, 2008).
It’s important to consider that the interpretation of the Second Amendment has been subject to ongoing debate and legal challenges, and any decision to repeal or alter it would likely require a thorough examination of the issue and a vote by the U.S Congress.
References:
United States Constitution. (1791). Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript Levinson, S. (2008). The Embarrassing Second Amendment. Yale Law Journal, 99(3), 637-659.