Respond to the class discussion post below in APA 7th ed format with intext citations and references:In the ongoing debate over healthcare provider remuneration, there is a convincing argument for shifting from a volume-based payment system to one that rewards the quality of care delivered. Healthcare providers Healthcare professionals should be compensated based on the quality of treatment provided as an incentive to improve their performance. This is founded on the idea that the financial compensation of healthcare providers should be proportionate to the quality of treatment they deliver (Konttila, J.et al., 2019). Performance Evaluation Criteria Quality and efficiency are the criteria I would use to evaluate the performance of healthcare providers. These will decide the extent to which the goals in health care may be met. Accessibility alludes to how easily patients can access the care they require when needed. Quality implies the amount to which the proper care is provided in the right way. Others will include efficiency (Mathes, T.et al., 2019) which reflects the degree to which accessibility and effectiveness are maximized by the resources used. Continuous Quality Improvement Physicians could potentially have a detrimental impact on the CQI of a healthcare facility. It brings together all team members of a health system or hospital to plan and implement continuous improvement methods and procedures. If they do not regularly adhere to proper protocols, they may raise the risk of adverse events, hospitalizations, and other challenges. Furthermore, if they are not open to feedback and do not engage in continuous learning and improvement, they may undermine the efficacy of CQI initiatives (Thakur, V.et al.,2023). To sum up, policymakers must strike a balance between pay-for-performance incentives and other criteria, such as provider compensation for underserved populations, and ensure that providers have the tools they need to offer high-quality treatment.